|
|
|
| Investment
Philosophy |
| Deregulation
and industry competitive factors have forced utilities into a consolidation
phase. The consolidation trend began in 1997 and since that time,
many utility acquisitions and mergers have occurred. Currently there
are approximately 120 publicly traded utility companies; management,
financial analysts and industry executives generally believe that
consolidation will result in an industry with 15-20 super-regional
or national companies during the next five years. Too, repeal of
the Public Utility Holding Company Act appears to draw ever closer
and we believe repeal will inspire considerable M&A activity
among utilities. |
| |
| Investment
Strategy |
| The
Distribution/Merging Utilities Portfolio invests only in utility
companies that we consider to be likely takeover candidates, and
only when such stocks are considered to offer substantial potential
price appreciation based on their projected acquisition value. We
expect the majority of investments to be in small and mid-sized
electric, gas and water companies since such companies offer a substantial
dividend yield, have excess cash flow, low capital expenditures,
sell at a low multiple of earnings and book value compared to other
companies, and feature minimal business or competitive risk. The
portfolio will focus primarily on distribution companies ("wires
and pipes" companies that deliver the services rather than
those that generate power), which we believe to represent the lower
risk segment of the utility industry. These companies continue to
have local monopoly status. |
| |
| Investment
Process |
| In
this portfolio the key driver is our evaluation of the potential
attractiveness of a particular company to another utility company
as an acquisition, and the potential profit we may derive should
a transaction occur, based on current market prices. We compare
all stocks in the universe to a model of private market value based
on the numerous transactions that have already been completed in
the industry. For those companies that reveal a potential of at
least 30% premium to current market value in a transaction, we evaluate
the regulatory environment that might enhance or impede a potential
deal. Some jurisdictions are "difficult," some are facilitators
of free market activities. We also analyze a company's strategic
fit with potential acquirers, and the problems or burdens which
could diminish a company's appeal. We further investigate management's
view of consolidation and convergence, and the proportion of shares
held by investors who might be congenial to a transaction. Stocks
are held indefinitely in anticipation of a transaction, or may be
sold in the event that current market pricing comes into equilibrium
with potential private market valuation. In addition, stocks may
be sold if management voices a clear antagonism toward a deal, or
if company fundamentals deteriorate sufficiently to alter the potential
private market value. |
|